UN-HABITAT around the world
Asia and the Pacific
China
Latin America & Caribbean
Jordan
Serbia
Loading...
CPR Member Log-in
Add New Best Practices
Home
|
Drafts
|
Completed
|
Posted
|
Submission Guide
Post this Nomination for Award
Preview this Best Practice
Delete this Best Practice
Nominate a Best Practice
General
Nominating Organization
Partners
Categories
Narrative
References
Finance
Supporting Material
Upgrade Review
Name of the Best Practice:
*
Required
Year:
Please Select
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
*
Required
City / Town / Village:
*
Required
Region:
Please select
Africa & Arab States
Asia & Pacific
Europe & Former Soviet Union States
European Union
Global
Latin America and the Caribbean
North America
*
Required
Country:
Please select
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Baltic States
Bangladesh
Barbados
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia-Hercegovina
Botswana
Brazil
British Virgin Islands
Brunei
Bulgaria
Burkina-Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Caribbean
Cayman Islands
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Central America
Central Asia
Chad
Channel Islands
Chile
China
Colombia
Comoros
Congo (Brazzaville)
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equitorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM)
France
French Guiana
French Polynesia
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea Bissau
Gulf States
Guyana
Haiti
Holy See
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Isle of Man
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Kosovo Province
Krygyz Republic
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Micronesia (Fed. States of)
Middle East
Middle East and Africa
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
North Korea
Northern Mariana Islands
Norway
Oman
Pacific Islands
Pakistan
Palau
Palestinian Territories
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Pitcairn
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Republic of Korea
Réunion
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Saint Helena
Saint Helena
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Saint-Pierre-et-Miquelon
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principle
Saudi Arabia
Scandinavia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Taiwan Province of China
Tajikistan
Tanzania
TFYR Macedonia
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks and Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
U.S.A
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates (UAE)
United Kingdom
United States Virgin Islands
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Venezuela
Vietnam
Virgin Islands
Wallis and Futuna Islands
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
*
Required
Has this initiative been
submitted previously?
Yes
No
*
Required
Previous Title:
Previous Year Submitted:
Invalid Value
Address of the Best Practice:
Including street, P.O. Box, City/Town, Postal Code, Country, Telephone, Fax and Email addresses. N.B. Please ensure country and city-codes are provided for telephone and fax. Please Note that the address should be provided in the sequence given above
8093 SWITZERLAND Neunbrunnenstrasse 50 TEL : +41446339079
*
Required
Name of Contact Person
*
Required
Email of Contact Person
*
Required
Type of Organisation of
the Best practice
Please select
Academic/Research
Central Government
Community-Based Organisation
Foundation
International Agency
Local Authority
Media
Non-Governmental Organisation
Para-statal
Philanthropist
Private Sector
Professional Association
Technical Experts/Consultants
Summary
In no more than 300 words, summarise the objectives and achievements of the initiative. Please note that the summary should be in narrative and not in point form.
Font
default
Arial
Courier New
Georgia
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Verdana
Impact
WingDings
Size
default
1 ( 8 pt)
2 (10 pt)
3 (12 pt)
4 (14 pt)
5 (18 pt)
6 (24 pt)
7 (36 pt)
URL
:
Target
:
New window
Current window
Parent window
Top window
OK
Cancel
*
Required
Key Dates
Provide no more than five dates that are significant to the initiative and for each date describe in no more than five or six words its significance.
Key Date 1: 03/01/2013 Research Project commencement Key Date 2: 09/02/2013 Summer School workshop Key Date 3: 12/01/2013 First prototype construction Key Date 4: 12/20/2015 Second prototype construction Key Date 5: 07/01/2017 Breaking ground third prototype
*
Required
Level of activity
Please select
City/Town
Global
International
Metropolitan
National
Neighbourhood
Provincial/State
Regional (international)
Village
*
Required
Eco system
Please select
Arid/Semi-Arid
Coastal
Continental
High Plateau
Island
Mountain
River Basin
Tropical/Sub-Tropical
*
Required
Once you have filled details on all the sections, please click on the "Post this Nomination for Award" at the top of the page.
Please observe the word limits specified overall under each headings. Use the following headings and suggestions to describe your work.
Font
default
Arial
Courier New
Georgia
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Verdana
Impact
WingDings
Size
default
1 ( 8 pt)
2 (10 pt)
3 (12 pt)
4 (14 pt)
5 (18 pt)
6 (24 pt)
7 (36 pt)
URL
:
Target
:
New window
Current window
Parent window
Top window
OK
Cancel
Situation Before the Initiative Began:
Describe the situation before the initiative began. What major problems and issues needed to be addressed in the area? What approximate population size within what approximate geographic area? What social groups e.g. women, youth, ethnic minorities, were affected and in what ways?
[50 WORDS]
The project is located in Khayelitsha, a predominantly informal settlement south east of Cape Town. The pilot project community have occupied the site for 28 years and comprise predominantly of Xhosa speaking economic migrants form the Eastern Cape of South Africa. The site is characterized by inadequate housing quality, a lack of basic infrastructure and services, environmental risks including flash fires, flooding and predatory violence. The current population of the pilot site exceeds 280 persons occupying approximately 4000m2.
*
Required
Establishment of Priorities:
List the priorities of the initiative. How was prioritization done and what groups were involved? Please specify leadership and gender specific roles where appropriate.
[100 WORDS]
(1) Urban mapping and enumeration to establish the “right to stay” recorded by the NGO with the Community Development Committee and Urban-Think Tank. (2) Development of Urban upgrade brief that defines the vision of the community developed with NGO with the Community Development Committee and Urban-Think Tank. (3) Urban deficit analysis and feasibility study completed by Urban-Think Tank with community input (4) Economic model and individual economic assessment completed by Urban-Think Tank, executed by NGO microfinance wing with Community Development Committee (5) Design research and development completed by Urban-Think Tank with structured feedback from various workshops (6) Unit allocation and micro-finance deposits by NGO and Community Development Committee (7) Consolidation of site and transfer to Department of Human Settlements / MOU signed (8) Displacement procedure and development phasing by Urban-Think Tank with Technical team in consultation with NGO and Community Development Committee (9) Building approvals (10) Construction with community labour (11) Completion, quality control and hand over (12) Post occupancy evaluation 1
*
Required
Formulation of Objectives And Strategies:
Provide a summary of the main objectives and strategies of the initiative, how they were established and by whom. Please specify any gender specific objectives and strategies. Describe policies and strategies adopted for city-wide development, where applicable.
[100 WORDS]
The project aims to reshape the approach to informal settlement upgrading by offering an innovative, accessible and inclusive methodology for the fair distribution of public space, a safer urban environment, delivery of basic services, and an urbanization scheme that combines housing upgrades with new economic and social possibilities. The long term goals are to influence a new direction in housing policy and offer much needed diversity and access to housing for the gap market. In general, the various stakeholders have been able to exercised their objectives through the various feedback and workshop formats. Date Printed:
*
Required
Mobilisation of Resources:
Describe how financial, technical and human resources were mobilized and where they came from including any form of bilateral and/or multilateral assistance. Specify key actors (including community/women’s groups), organisations or institutions that were/are responsible and accountable for managing the resources.
[200 WORDS]
The project leverages the resources of previously established community leadership groups and extends these to include community volunteers and NGO representatives into a Development Committee. The Committee represent the interests of the broader community and are present at all major professional planners and municipal meetings. The Committee was first elected in 2007 and is sits re-election on a yearly basis at a general meeting in the community. The committee are responsible to encourage broad-based community participation and assist in managing and ensuring community commitment to the scheme in the form of contracted micro-finance contributions. This task is performed with the support from the micro-finance wing of the NGO. Where needed, the Committee refer issues to a higher leadership structures in the form of South Africa National Civic Organsiations. The Legal Resource Centre of Cape Town have provided invaluable assistance with the development of legal documents with the City of Cape Town planning authorities. The project has secured substantial infrastructure funding from the City of Cape Town, who also offering the land and the management of the infrastructure implementation. The main project sponsorship is courtesy of the Swiss Re Foundation.
*
Required
Process :
Describe the problems faced in implementing the initiative, how were they overcome, and the problems that remain to be solved. Describe also how people (men and women), communities, organisations and institutions participated in the initiative. Describe how people, communities and organisations participated in decision making processes and what their inputs were, with regard to basic needs, civil rights and/or policies. Provide a summary of tools, methods, and/or benchmarks that were used for assessing performance, who is using them and how often. For example: report cards, joint assessments etc. Weekly, monthly etc.
[400 WORDS]
In general, the innovative nature of the project has resulted in unfamiliar timelines and procedures that vary from normalised activities. This is a challenge that is difficult to plan for, as such, delays and re-planning need to be communicated through consistent channels whereby feedback and concerns should be logged. The evaluation module is designed to offer a framework to measure the performance of the urban upgrade based on key indicators of health, security, perceptions of value and empowerment, and safety. The evaluation includes standardised questionnaires and structured interviews, and will be implemented with the support of community volunteers before the beginning of construction and conclude one year after completion of construction. In order to ensure the evaluation responds to particular concerns and ambitions of the community, the leadership and evaluation volunteers have been invited to offer feedback and additional indicators. These inputs will be reformulated and integrated into the framework before implementation. e framework will also be directed at evaluating the livelihood programs with specific question clusters focused on energy, sanitation and water management, micro-financing and agriculture respectfully. A Post-occupancy evaluation was conducted on the first four units in 2016 in order to serve as a record of the projects performance. The document acts as a quality control measure of both the design decision-making and construction methodology. Secondly, the evaluation uncovers the resident’s perceptions of the project. This task was tackled a year after construction to provide the architects with an overview of the building’s material and structural performance. A thorough, on-site inspection was made with drawing mark-ups and questionnaires for the residents.
*
Required
Results Achieved :
Describe to what extent the objectives listed above were realised, how the impact was measured, quantitatively and qualitatively and who benefited and how. Describe how the initiative has resulted in.
[250 WORDS]
The project aims to reshape the approach to informal settlement upgrading by offering an innovative, accessible and inclusive methodology for the fair distribution of public space, a safer urban environment, delivery of basic services, and an urbanization scheme that combines housing upgrades with new economic and social possibilities. The scheme is currently in the final phase of construction after which the evaluation framework will be activated to assess the extent as to which the various objectives were met. The evaluation framework has been designed to offer insights and measure the impact of the development through themed indicators of the built environment. These indicators include: baseline health and economics, security, perceptions of value, and are measured through both multi-choice questionnaires and qualitative structured interviews. The evaluation framework also extends to postoccupancy assessments of the material and performance quality of the built environment and the impressions of the occupying residents. Results from the Post-occupancy evaluation of the first phase of development indicated a clear increase in the perceptions of safety and value to all residents interviewed.
*
Required
Sustainability :
Describe how the integration of the social, economic, environmental, institutional and cultural elements of sustainability was achieved, particularly with regards to Financial, Social and Economic, Cultural, Environmental and Institutional.
[300 WORDS]
(Financially) The land readjustment leverages the latent commodity value of the land currently restricted by the current occupation. Cross-financing through the introduction of rental and sales stock due to the densification strategy provides potential for economic sustainability. Micro-finance contributions not only support the recovery of investment but also add adjunct funds for maintenance. These loans are based on affordability assessments in align with South African lending laws and are adjusted according to individual capacity. (Social and Economic) Two layers of social inclusion in the development include the regular series of open community workshops and the weekly meetings of the Community Development Committee. (Culturally) the project taps into and works with pre-existing leadership decision-making and communication processes and enhanced these through the establishment of the Development Committee. (Environmental) The project will create land use, energy, and water benefits. A new spatial plan and the two story prototype will allow for the recovery of up to 40 percent of land presently reserved for residential use. This ‘recaptured’ area will be converted to shared public courtyards appropriate for small-scale agriculture, boosting food security and ‘greening’ the pilot site. Ecologically, The resulting densification of the settlement will also mean more efficient land use and infrastructure in comparison to typical green field developments. Recycling greywater from hand basin to flush toilets, and bio-filters to manage urban storm water. (Institutional) The project is groundbreaking in the terms that it offers insitu-upgrading within the formal development framework of the municipal council. This means that the geometries and dimensions of formalised planning are referenced in the layouts and land allocation of the new layouts but are then sub-divided to allow greater access.
*
Required
Lessons Learned :
Describe the three or four most important lessons learned and how these lessons have been or are being incorporated in your initiative and/or other initiatives. Describe any lessons learned from other initiatives that were incorporated into your initiative. Describe how these lessons learned have been or are being taken into consideration in determining ongoing or future policies, strategies and action plans for example, what would you do differently or avoid doing in scaling up or transferring your experience?
[300 WORDS]
The most important learning of the project has been the need to create recognisable and formalised bridges between the lived experience of informal settlement residents and the formal systems that control the use of land and access to formal instruments. These learning’s have come about through urban deficit analysis including structured interviews and multi-stakeholder workshops and have resulted in direct dialogue with city officials. Working closely with the community and NGO, the planning team were able to build on grassroots strategies for communication and co-designing including scale models and inclusive and equitable systems for meetings and discussions. Further learning’s applicable to scale up include the importance of early establishment of lines of communication to the community at large and the importance of clear organograms deciphering responsibilities of all stakeholders. A concerted effort for expectation management is also a key learning. This is especially the case when projects are pioneering new territory and comprise of a large component of research, adjustment and development. With these key learning’s in mind, the team have accordingly developed the digital planning tools and online interface to reflect the need for transparency, role definition and feedback loops.
*
Required
Transfers :
a)
Transferability:
Describe how your initiative has benefited from the experience or expertise of other practices. Describe how your initiative could be replicated. If the process of replication has commenced, please indicate when and by whom
b)
Transferred Best Practice:
This applies only to those who are submitting their practice specifically for one of the two awards earmarked for best practice transfers. Describe how the transfer was initiated and by whom, purpose of the transfer and what the transfer involved (staff exchanges, study tours, ad hoc technical assistance, etc.), resource and financial implications involved in the transfer including staff time, travel, transfer of funds, software or technology, etc, results or impact of the transfer in, for example, changes in policy, management tools and methods, lessons learned from the transfer and what you would do differently in the event of future transfers
[400 WORDS]
The project references cutting edge Land Readjustment practices as documented in a recent UN-Habitat publication “Remaking the Urban Mosaic” and takes inspiration from “re-blocking” activities practiced by various SDI affiliated grassroots organisations in South Africa and Thailand. However, what makes the development project unique is its strategic alignment to formal procedures of land management and formal intuitions and governance bodies. By providing a scalable methodology for land readjustment for the urban poor, while also building bridges to introduce marginalised populations with clear self-determined pathways for formalisation. The scalability of the approach is supported by the design method of adopting an iterative approach that tests and refines a series of constructed prototypes in-situ, the project builds in a process of simultaneous monitoring and evaluation. The methodology of informal settlement upgrading is developed to be scalable and replicable and is applicable to any informal settlement with coherent representation and gap markets for rental or sales. To date, the project has been scaled from 1 unit (2013) to 4 units (2015) to 72 units (2017-18) with discussions currently underway with State Government for a site of 200 units. Digital planning tools for the management and documentation of the upgrade project developed at the ETH support the transparent and fluid workflow of all stakeholders involved including land owners, municipal governments, upgrade facilitators and the community development committee. These tools in the form of an upgrade tablet application, computational analysis and planning software and an online interface support the replicability and scalability of the project
*
Required
Related Policies
Font
default
Arial
Courier New
Georgia
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Verdana
Impact
WingDings
Size
default
1 ( 8 pt)
2 (10 pt)
3 (12 pt)
4 (14 pt)
5 (18 pt)
6 (24 pt)
7 (36 pt)
URL
:
Target
:
New window
Current window
Parent window
Top window
OK
Cancel
Site Map
|
Site Directory
|
Contact Us
|
Feedback
|
Terms & Conditions